<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Writing with Rapport &#187; Positive Language</title>
	<atom:link href="http://writingwithrapport.com/positive-language/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://writingwithrapport.com</link>
	<description>Essential 21st Century Writing Skills</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 20:08:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Weed Out Unnecessary Negatives</title>
		<link>http://writingwithrapport.com/2009/11/weed-out-unnecessary-negatives/</link>
		<comments>http://writingwithrapport.com/2009/11/weed-out-unnecessary-negatives/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 08:37:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joanna</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Positive Language]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[embedded command]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://writingwithrapport.com/?p=63</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is a simple but powerful tip for coaches and teachers who are writing to influence and encourage their readers. You don&#8217;t want to overdo the positive messages in your writing or you&#8217;ll start to sound unreal (and break rapport with your reader).  You also run the risk of creating too big a stretch between [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a simple but powerful tip for coaches and teachers who are writing to influence and encourage their readers.</p>
<p><span id="more-63"></span></p>
<p>You don&#8217;t want to overdo the positive messages in your writing or you&#8217;ll start to sound unreal (and break rapport with your reader).  You also run the risk of creating too big a stretch between where your reader is currently at and where you and they want to be (which means you need to go back to <a id="aptureLink_sWfGl05o2w" href="http://writingwithrapport.com/2009/10/pace-and-lead-your-readers/">pacing</a>.)</p>
<p>But you don&#8217;t want to shoot yourself in the foot by adding in unnecessary doubt.  Focus on the positive message you&#8217;re putting across, and edit your words so the ideas you&#8217;re putting across avoid the negatives.</p>
<p>This is also a way of working in a subtle <strong>embedded command</strong>.  Your reader can pick up on a <strong>simple verb phrase</strong> like &#8220;avoid the negative&#8221; and accept it (subconsciously) as an instruction or invitation.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s an example from a piece of work I was editing recently.  The author was attempting to create rapport with her readers through reassurance, along the lines of &#8216;you don&#8217;t need to do this because I&#8217;m telling you to, but because all the evidence points towards this being a sensible approach&#8217;.</p>
<p>The phrase ran:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;You won&#8217;t be compelled to do this because I&#8217;m telling you to, but because of the evidence you&#8217;ve gathered&#8230;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>What the reader actually picks up on is not the reassurance but the negative instruction:  &#8220;You won&#8217;t be compelled.&#8221;</p>
<p>This has two subtle effects.</p>
<p>1) The reader internalises the embedded command &#8220;you won&#8217;t be compelled</p>
<p>2) Rapport is not enhanced but weakened.  You&#8217;re undermining the trust relationship by injecting doubt in your own teaching.</p>
<p>An alternative would be something like this:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;If <em>you&#8217;re compelled to do this</em> it&#8217;s because the evidence you&#8217;ve gathered points you that way..&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>All I&#8217;ve done is added in some extra words and changed the construction to include an &#8220;if&#8221;.  Yes, that still allows for an element of doubt (it&#8217;s not a command, it&#8217;s just a possibility that you&#8217;ll find yourself <em>compelled to do this</em>).</p>
<p>Can you see how this works in the embedded command?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also a way of <strong>enhancing rapport</strong>: you and your reader, on the same side, working towards the place both you and they want to be.</p>
<p>Remember: pacing and leading&#8230; on the same side.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://writingwithrapport.com/2009/11/weed-out-unnecessary-negatives/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
